Naming of the Testcases:
So if one wants to measure the space of preseeding use cases theoretically: 3 * 3 *3*15*7
octave:1> 3 * 3 *3*15*7
ans = 2835
That is the chance to be misunderstood (as a help seeking user and as someone asking for working demos), because unprecise determination in this world of creationg is extrem. So we are extra-careful. Then wie need to proove that a maintainer’s demoscript is working and btw. keep it in the Testsuite. For example
a testfunction is then programmatically named
These are the use cases I figured out:
-case Environment: physical Hardware (hw), qemu, chroot( 3)
-case: Ubuntu/Debian/Linux (3)
-case: Tool vor creation: one of the Fifteen
-case methods (about 7):
Debian methods: https://debian-handbook.info/browse/de-DE/stable/sect.automated-installation.html
188.8.131.52.first create the Boot-Medium (hw) (These are two enduring processes: 1. creation 2.installation
184.108.40.206.1. AUS DEM NETZWERK HOCHFAHREN
PXE (?)configuration for the boot server:/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default
(hw: bootserver uncommon?)
220.127.116.11.2. EINEN BOOTFÄHIGEN USB-STICK HERSTELLEN
Preseed-Datei nach /media/usbdisk/preseed.cfg
18.104.22.168.3. EIN CD-ROM-ABBILD ERSTELLEN
debian-cd/README.. (hw: complicated?)
extended Ubuntu methods (who many?)
virt-install methods: (who many?)
-(inject from path and netinstall)
virt-install –connect=qemu:///system –location=http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer\-i386 –initrd-inject=Downloads/preseed.cfg –extra-args=“auto“ –name d-i –ram=512 –disk=pool=default,size=5,format=qcow2,bus=virtio
-(other use cases, which not, which are left?)
Commented Link List
https://debianstuff.dittberner.info/gitweb/?p=babelbox-packer.git;a=summary who is packer?
BabelBox: automated DebianInstaller testing and demo machine
BabelBox is a system designed to demonstrate the automation (bingo) capabilities of the Debian Installer. It also shows the high number and the quality of translations available for the installer. It is well suited for a live demo (bingo)on a booth in an expo or any other event.
Todo: -issue a feature request:foolproof, out of box, quick preseed testing, feature: Test_whole_debian_family_playing_check_against_each_other
-install on test machine with virt qemu cl, running a hello world to run a guest in a guest, good Idea? cpmletiong state, stale: no ip connection with host.
-BabelBox: a lot installation, a lot installation planning..
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller Automate installs with preseed
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Preseed#Examples 8 automation usage cases as Howtos
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Links BabelBox, web-if for sources, preseed 10 years old
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/preseed.git/log/ so, this is the official uptodate developement repro git hub of debian? Ok . This webif does not of to look up the author and date per file as known from github, one should use local git.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/preseed here preceeding developement takes place as well, at least
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/preseed.git/tree/t/01-auto-install.t?id=f75e94a1b95a9f65d46c2884f443b7d8b1916c6d#n3 perl test suite for preseeding
three preconfiguration methods=(initrd-preseed file-preseed network-preseed)
8*4*4 Installation methods=
(Boot Udebs ? Base system Tasks)*(CD network harddisk USB CDimage)(netboot mini.iso businesscard CD netinst CD full CD/DVD hd-media)
The five stages with its components with the three preseedings between.
Here you got the vocabulary, do you know all? This is the big picture. And surely you can demo test none of them.
About the Is-Situation, about users‘ annoyed, 10 years lasting and now situation; a frequent opinion to be found about the historic situation of availability of the functionality. It is the accusation against the development of preseeding as a whole, limiting the user sensibly and have him kept away from the functionality as hopelessly remorseless as effectively permanent.- Worth to be discussed in how far this gets true. Hardly to imaging to find a setting in which to discuss it governed by rationality – probably! Does that say, that these „admins-developers“ keep it messy, not to loose the jobs? If so then hostile intention shall be considered. And: Debian is by no means the only tool for donating confusion. qemu, lib-virt live in the same boat assuming any such regime of desinformation. In a broader view I have not considered, if security concerns could be affected or not. I at for moral objections can perceive no impiousness around heading for a world of „easy images“ – up to now . I rather should consider „racket influence“ instead, some „brain wash“ among the people concerned, maintaining them users in odyssey mode while leaving time at it. The situation is bizarr. They think in everything but not in maintaining a „easy image“ solution; here is where doubts come up. If one needs to admit, that an „easy image“ solution is not simply possible, this equivalents to „we have not even a „hello world“ of our software. As the software than appears rather a big „hey“ stack of scripts of historic staff, one should head for a completely new design and rewrite. And to a discussion about it. For my problems at the stage I am writing this, I believe: having not a decent IP connection to the guest is an qemu issue .. Good by and good Luck Debian, Debian-Installer by now. (:
Yes, and one could check ouf babelbox, but therefore it is necessary to learn packer. Packer?
On the other hand, thinking on a campaign qemu-buro-dpkg comes in. Why not ask among the 240 coderd and contributors of – for example nowadays – packer, to provide a „helloworld easy image“ for qemu-buro? Is it not easier on base of this analysis, to just contribute an „hello world“ and then return to your code work of your presumed business world around images without? I want to reasonably petition to contribute code on the debian-boot mailing list. Thanks in advance.
https://www.soljerome.com/blog/2011/10/23/preseeding-debian-wheezy/ another newer unofficial block including the below, but where is the explication to hello world a guest?
d-i preseed/late_command string \ in-target wget http://www.siriad.com/preseed/postinst.sh -O /root/postinst.sh; \ in-target /bin/bash /root/postinst.sh
http://alexconst.net/2016/01/11/packer/ I could not understand otherwise than another promising „we wont hello world for you“ show: „QEMU, Virtualbox, and VMware builders“
lightweight, portable, and command-line driven. This makes it the perfect tool to put in the middle of your continuous delivery pipeline.
Why do they torture users with json format, is their anything to learn from it? Before using me, you should should put a file .json on your computer? This what you call command line usage? (No?) Jason? Was not the speech from him, when oudeis went to Kirke?